Running into the Great Firewall of China

I access data from public Chinese webservers for some of the data I present on this blog.  During the start of the Google/China controversy I began to notice some odd 'errors' as I attempted to access Chinese web servers.  Sometimes I get a simple 'hello!' from the server and nothing else, other times I get a 404 error and other times there is no problem.  

I wonder if the 'Great Firewall of China' as described by the WSJ is working on keeping away the outsiders as well? 

China generally doesn't tell its people when it is interfering with their Web access, unlike some other countries, such as Saudi Arabia, that give explanatory warning messages when users are denied access to forbidden sites.

Instead, China's filtering can look to users like a technical glitch—an error message in a user's browser that makes it seem like his connection to the Internet malfunctioned. Authorities don't discuss the methods or tools they use.

Anyone else running into the same issues? 
Here's one test I just ran:
http://www.pbc.gov.cn/  -- Returns 'hello'
 
http://www.pbc.gov.cn/english/ -- Gives me a 404 error (page not found)
 
Both of those sites have worked on and off for a week or so. If you do a Google search for "people's bank of china" these are the first links you get and the Chinese central bank is not an obscure web site I'm hitting.  There's others web sites that return the same errors... puzzling . . . .

[edit 04/05/10 11:20am pst: I was able to access the above web sites on Saturday and pull the data I was looking for.  Today, Monday, I was unable to do so and received the same error messages.  I'm going to get a packet sniffer and see if the error message / 'hello' comes from the same location as the normal data and see if the Great Fire Wall is somehow blocking me ]

Will HELOC's toast the banks?

Ouch... I read this several days ago and after turning it over in my head it jived with my previous tinfoil allegation the banks are managing their losses over time  . . .

From Creditwritedowns:

About a month ago I wrote a post called “The coming wave of second mortgage writedowns” the gist of which was that the big four banks (Citi, JP, BofA, and Wells) had a shed load of exposure to now worthless second mortgages. With many first mortgages now hopelessly underwater, it stands to reason that second mortgages on those same properties have zero value. . . .

So the original loss from second-liens, as reported by the stress tests, was $68.4 billion for the four largest banks. If you look at those numbers again, and assume a loss of 40% to 60%, numbers that are not absurd by any means, you suddenly are talking a loss of between $190 billion and $285 billion. Which means if the stress tests were done with terrible 2nd lien performance in mind, there would have been an extra $150 billion dollar hole in the balance sheet of the four largest banks. Major action would have been taken against the four largest banks if this was the case.

Please go over and read the whole thing. I stopped following the bank several quarters ago. Any additional facts on this possibility would be appreciated.

This would explain the banks' dragging their feet foreclosing properties.  Not only would they have to mark down their first mortgage but the 2nd lein would be marked to zero instead of the 15-20% loss as described in the 'Stress Tests' of early last year.

A clever etf tool with a reverse stock lookup feature.

http://www.xtf.com/ has a great feature on their web site I have been looking for -- reverse stock lookup. You can type in a stock symbol and find what etf's hold that company. Sort by size and you can instantly find sector etfs.  This is a great way to find similiar stock or etfs.

http://www.xtf.com/

The reverse stock / etf lookup feature is free after signup.  Give it a try!

Inventory / Sales ratio back to "Normal"

Inventory / Sales ratio data is pretty much back to normal, as I mentioned in the last update of this data series.  The ratio ticked down a little.  Not much to see here, move along. . . .

Inflation expectations and the Treasury market

Here's your TIP / Treasury market update.  Nothing extraordinary has happened in the Treasury / TIP market in the last few months.  As mentioned in my last entry the easy money has been made and now it is a lot harder (Tips v. nominals)

One item of note is the real TIPS yield is still relatively low as compared to the history of this data series with the last entry being a 1.42% real yield.  Not very exciting, eh?  The 10 year breakeven inflation rate is effectively where it was two years ago before the Financial panic hit (2.27%) 

About this blog

I started writing this blog with several goals in mind:  Producing work for consumption by others forces one to collect and present your thoughts in a slightly more organized manner as well as be more diligent in checking your facts and figures.  This is similiar to the few occasions I have taught or presented material in an academic setting. As this was very long ago I fear my meagre writing skills have deteriorated since then. Writing a blog will hopefully improve those rusty skills.

There are numerous blogs posting an almost infinite amount of data and opinions on the web.  If the blogosphere is concentrating on a topic I will very likely NOT comment upon it as you have most likely already read about it elsewhere.  No need to waste our time repeating the hot news of the day. 

Right now I anticipate I will blog mostly about various data series I keep up with and some short commentary on the data.  I'll occasionally post my opinions about various events or predicitions but I'll keep my posts short and to the point (I may digress but I'll try to restrain myself)  I am not a verbose writer and like myself you are probably overwhelmed with data and opinions on the markets. 

I am a fee only financial advisor and money manager in Tacoma, Washington, USA  Here is my long term track record so if you are looking to pay someone please consider me.  (That's the end of my pitch)

This blog is not to be construed as financial advice by any stretch of the imagination. I do not know your financial needs or desires, your cash flow needs, your debt level, current and future tax rates, your tolerance for risk, what country you live in, how many kids you have, how variable your income flows are, etc.  Don't come crying to me if I say I'm buying or selling something and the trade blows up on you.

I'm NOT going to tell you my total portfolio make up.  I will not however tell you to buy something if I'm short it or closing out my position.  That's called being unethical. 

Almost all my posts will not be edited or revised later.  There are a few exceptions (like this post) and a few others which will be living documents but these will be marked as such.   While I may make spelling or grammatical changes within a short time after posting I intend this blog to be a record of my thoughts over time. (If I do make edits beyond spelling or typos it will be duly noted as such in the entry.)

Please make comments or ask questions!  The blogosphere is great for connecting with others to share research or honestly debate situations.  While I'm a busy guy I'll try to at least respond to your queries.

[edited 2010 08 17 to clean up some prose]

North Korea - The craziest country in the world

Here's an impressive graphic with some stats surrounding North Korea.   The image may be a bit too small to read; here's the original.