Kicking Copper while its down

A little more than six months ago I laid out a bearish case for the red metal, also known as Dr. Copper by those in the markets for its ability to predict future economic change.  With the recent thrashing copper and many other risk assets have taken I thought revisiting the topic would be a good idea.

While China is a large factor in all base metals prices let's start with the Old World and the seemingly mundane issue of actually counting how much copper inventory is on hand.  While this would appear to be as simple as looking up the LME (London Metal Exchange) and COMEX (US futures) inventory numbers it really isn't.  The BBC ran a three part series on rising commodity prices in late May and spent nearly a third of the program on copper.

BBC Radio - Bubble Trouble - Part 1 - May 28,2011
BBC Radio - Bubble Trouble - Part 2 and 3
Ft.com blog highlighting the inventory issue
In part 2 around the seven minute mark the presenter takes a tour of a well known base metals warehouse in which the warehouse representative reveals only about 40% of the copper in the warehouse is registered as LME inventory.  When I heard the words I had to replay it several times to ensure I understood that correctly; my brain almost rebelled at the concept of anyone just coming out and publicly stating such a figure.  Now I'm not suggesting the LME reported amount is under counting European stocks by 40%, just that this one warehouse has a lot more copper inside its walls that is reported to LME.  Please listen to at least part 2 of the radio series to get the full details.  If it can happen in one warehouse in Rotterdam what is preventing it from happening elsewhere in the world?

So why is the copper 'hiding'? Some of it is because costs are cheaper to store it in a non registered warehouse versus an official LME warehouse. Another factor may be what is suspected to be going on in China. FT Alphaville has discussed import/export trading firms there are using copper as a credit funding vehicle because other more official forms of credit are drying up.

From ft.com blog

Here’s the gist of it.In the first instance, our source says, the strategy is not exclusive to copper markets but goes on across most commodity markets.
The banks call it “inventory financing”. And of course, we should stress, it is completely legal. The practice mainly involves pledging an asset in return for an exchange warrant or cash.
According to our source, traders can deposit copper in an exchange warehouse in order to receive a warrant which can then be used to gain financing, usually via a broker, and less a 15 or 20 per cent haircut needed to cover futures margin deposits (sometimes called margin or warrant financing).

Read the whole article to get the full weight of what they are doing. This copper-as-financing would help explain why copper continues to be imported even though for most of 2011 it has been cheaper on the domestic Shanghai exchange. For the credit focused copper trader the money created by the transaction has greater value than the actual copper, it is just a funding mechanism.

LME vs Shanghai premium/discount

While the discount has been steadily falling one must understand China is a net importer of Copper; so why has it been cheaper to buy copper inside China?

Izabella Kaminska followed up a few weeks later with more details on the same copper-as-collateral trade

More worryingly however is that the primary use of copper in bonded warehouse appears to be as a financing mechanism to provide cheap working capital for various types of business often unrelated to the metallic industry.

Another copper financing entry at ft.com

Simon Hunt, of Simon Hunt strategic services actually goes to China and tries to see what is happening on the ground and his opinion is not bullish.  An audio interview from March 29 is very interesting.

Having just come back from China my impression is that more and more people are beginning to understand that a lot of copper that has been imported has not gone into furnaces, that it is held by both foreign and Chinese financial institutions and others and I do think that even at the top level in government there is now starting to be a concern of the impact of this speculation on China's economy.  Because it is not just copper - it goes much deeper than that.  With money which has been so freely available in recent years, and with negative deposit rates, any company or individual is very reluctant to hold funds on deposit.  So they are looking for other means of investment and it goes into commodity markets generally - the stock market, it goes into manufacturing investment and so on so forth.  Whether government does anything to stop this game going on I've no idea, but there is at least a realisation at a pretty senior level that these developments are ongoing. 

Mr. Hunt also brings up the insidious problem of negative real interest rates in a growing economy.  Empty cities such as Ordos are an example of what happens when people respond to the obvious distortion of losing money when you put it in a bank account.

Even the Chileans are publicly talking about the excess inventory in China

The world No.1 copper producer, Chile's state-ownedCodelco, sounded a warning shot at the CESCO copper industrygathering in Santiago on Monday, saying copper stocks in China were abnormally high and needed to be watched carefully.

Figures are tossed about regarding how much inventory has been tied up in these financing deals but one never really knows how much until the real washout hits and people are forced to dump their positions.

That being said, some analysts are putting out huge numbers as to the extent of hidden inventory, again from ft.com blog

The ICSG data shows an increase in Chinese demand of 99% for the four years between 2005 and 2009 when Chinese GDP probably rose by about a third. Obviously, there cannot possibly have been such a massive rise in copper’s intensity of use in China. You can look through all the intensity of use curves for every commodity for every economy in history and you will never find a doubling in consumption against a one third increase in GDP over so short a period of time.  

The numbers are large, around 4 million tonnes since the end of 2006. This dates from when global fabricators and others started to understand that a new paradigm in the copper market had begun. It was the involvement of the financial community by buying copper directly from producers and others and warehousing the metal outside the reporting system.

Standard Chartered puts the amount of hidden inventory lower, but still extensive, April 28

 High inventories in bonded warehouses point to the possibility of destocking, which could hit copper prices on the London Metal Exchange (LME). As of this week, we estimate that total copper stocks in bonded warehouses in Shanghai (usually 80% of the national total) have hit 650 thousand tonnes (kt) – equivalent to roughly four weeks of China's domestic use, a record-high level (Chart 2). This is significantly higher than 550kt in late February and the 200kt average over the past three years.

Who's the sucker? If you don't know, its probably you.

ETFs have been a useful tool to allow banks to move risk off balance sheet. When a bank takes on risk through lending to or financing a big commodity player, say for an acquisition, there is a need to hedge potentially huge commodity exposure — so as sell to lock in the commodity price, and you couldn’t sell that volume easily into the terminal market; although you could transfer a large amount of exposure to investors through an ETF more easily. The only way this used to be done is by the bank taking proprietary risk, but they now have other risk issues and aren’t prepared to carry that sort of exposure.
Using ETFs becomes a mutuality of interest, with everyone moving to launch products to investors – retail and institutional – so that they can carry the risk instead. It’s all about de-risking your book. And you saw it in the dot com bust when investment banks pushed dotcoms, but offloaded the risk to investors. When the NASDAQ crashed the investors carried the bulk of the exposure.It all has similarities to the Abacus CDO. If you want to short the market you have to create the demand, like Paulson did. If you are an institutional advisor you can do that by hyping the commodity.

The actual import numbers going into China for both refined and scrap do not mesh well with the meme of voracious demand. On a year over year basis both are falling.

Furthermore the reported inventory numbers have been wandering around the 600k number for a while. Ironically the last time year over year inventory numbers dipped into negative territory for a while was 2008.

I'm not the only one who is not a copper bull.  The Reformed Broker sums it nicely while debating a copper bull:

I will admit some of my thesis is based upon information that is not reported as cut and dried numbers that can easily be looked up on a computer screen but what I do find does not add up to the template of China hoovering up all known copper deposits in the universe:

• Copper is cheaper in Shanghai than in London
• Copper imports of all kinds are dropping
• Public reports of a LOT of hidden copper stocks, in the Old Word as well as China and confirmed by Chileans

I could go on but you need to put in some work as well. Read over the links below. I saved a few bombshells  for your discovery...

Additional reading:

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2011/05/11/565696/chinese-commodity-imports-are-falling/
http://macro-man.blogspot.com/2011/05/commodities-are-crap.html
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2011/05/16/569436/chinas-copper-collateral-and-covert-credit/
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-15/copper-users-in-china-plunder-stockpiles-as-goldman-forecasts-record-rally.html
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2011/05/24/576131/and-now-goldman-says-the-commodities-correction-is-over/
http://pragcap.com/on-the-conflict-of-interest-that-exists-between-research-and-commodity-traders
http://traderightuk.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/guest-blog-david-threlkeld-on-copper/
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2011/06/21/601061/coppers-inventory-inconsistency-charted/
https://customers.reuters.com/community/newsletters/metals/MetalsInsider20110729.pdf -- Page 2 -- If the warehouses are about to be empty of any metal, why buy them?
http://ineteconomics.org/blog/money-view/copper-standard
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2011/08/31/665791/a-new-development-in-chinas-copper-collateral-trade/
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2011/09/07/671416/more-than-2-8m-tonnes-of-hidden-copper-stocks/ - another estimate in an SEC filing guessing there's 2.8 million metric tons in hidden copper stocks.
http://traderightuk.wordpress.com/2011/09/07/guest-blog-simon-hunt-on-copper/ - More on the 2.8 million ton question.
http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2011/09/19/dr-copper-gets-a-check-up-in-shanghai/
http://www.economist.com/node/21530107?frsc=dg|a

The Author is long precious metals and short base metals

A contrary opinion on HELOC's and banks

I recently posted an article about the concern HELOC's may have on bank capital positions. Here's a contrary opinion from another blog I follow, Calculatedrisk

The following report is from housing economist Tom Lawler:
In a House Financial Services Committee meeting today on “Second Liens and Other Barriers to Principal Reduction as an Effective Foreclosure Mitigation Program, spokespersons from BoA, Citi, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo explained the potential dangers of broad principal reductions, as well as tried to dismiss the silly claim that many second mortgages have “virtually no value” because so many borrowers with seconds have total mortgage balances at or exceeding the value of the home collateralizing those mortgages. Below are some observations on BoA’s and Chase’s testimony.

I'd read the whole article as it provides some counter points to my previous post. 

Popular media discovering where all those delinquent mortgage payments are going

I was going to blog about this yesterday afternoon but fundmymutualfund yet again scooped me on the entry and added his usual commentary to the matter.  As I have implied before the money NOT going to paying a mortgage is just being spent by Joe and Jane Consumer. 

Diana Olick of CNBC:

Okay, so 7.9 million Americans are not paying their mortgages.

Are we really thinking about the implications of that?
I've already reported studies that show Americans are now far more likely to pay their other bills first before their mortgage (which is a big turnaround historically speaking.)
That means they pay off their credit cards, cable bills, car loans in place of their home loans. Some are forced to, while others are doing so strategically. Don't get me started again on strategic defaults...
Paul Jackson, publisher of Housingwire.com, wrote a fascinating article last week that put this into real cash perspective.
First he describes a case study of someone who applied for the government's Home Affordable Modification Program.
The person had an $1,880.00 monthly mortgage payment on which they'd defaulted, but said person's monthly bank statement showed payments to a tanning salon, nail spa, liquor stores, DirecTV bill with premium charges, and $1,700.00 in retail purchases from The Gap, Old Navy, Home Depot, Sears, etc.
Writes Jackson:
Even if you assume that just half of the current 7.4 million currently delinquent mortgages fit this sort of ’spending profile’ (that is, they are spending their mortgage) and you assume a $1,000 median monthly mortgage payment for most U.S. homeowners — you get a $3.7 billion boost per month to consumer spending. It’s certainly enough spending to matter in the overall scheme of things.

To sum up the program as described by fundmymutualfund:

So for newer readers here is the 'game' as I've outlined many times.


1.Home'owners' default.. many of which are owners only in practice (not putting a dime down on their home).
2.That money once used to pay mortgages can now go into the economy as a form of permanent stimulus via consumption. Back in November I figured the number to be akin to the spring 2008 Bush stimulus - but instead of a 1x benefit, it's a permanent stimulus.
3.The banks drag feet on foreclosures because to make their balance sheet look good they will only take so many foreclosures over in any 1 quarter. Since the FASB (accounting board) rule change, they can do this since they don't have to mark the mortgages to reality - they can pretend... until of course the actual foreclosure. So the majority of mortgages on their books are still at "their discretion" and only the % they foreclose on, do they have to mark to "market" (i.e. reality). Hence the 6 months foreclosure now turns into the 18+ month foreclosure.
4.The market could care less about losses for large banks or the reality of the balance sheet because the US government stands behind all major banks... they are too big to fail. So the banks have nothing to worry about. Buy financial stocks - they are risk free, like Treasuries.
5.In the meantime Ben Bernanke will keep rates at 0% so the banks can "out earn" the losses. [Apr 20, 2009: How Banks Will "Outearn" Their Losses] Borrow from Fed at 0%, invest in anything (stocks, bonds...heck even do some loans), and make the spread. Use that 'free money' to offset foreclosure losses.
Presto magic!

So tell me what you think will happen to consumer spending when those 10% of people with late mortgages finally get kicked out of their homes and the banks are finally forced to realize the loss on the loan?  You wonder why the banks are not lending?  Extend and pretend only works so long. . .

Will HELOC's toast the banks?

Ouch... I read this several days ago and after turning it over in my head it jived with my previous tinfoil allegation the banks are managing their losses over time  . . .

From Creditwritedowns:

About a month ago I wrote a post called “The coming wave of second mortgage writedowns” the gist of which was that the big four banks (Citi, JP, BofA, and Wells) had a shed load of exposure to now worthless second mortgages. With many first mortgages now hopelessly underwater, it stands to reason that second mortgages on those same properties have zero value. . . .

So the original loss from second-liens, as reported by the stress tests, was $68.4 billion for the four largest banks. If you look at those numbers again, and assume a loss of 40% to 60%, numbers that are not absurd by any means, you suddenly are talking a loss of between $190 billion and $285 billion. Which means if the stress tests were done with terrible 2nd lien performance in mind, there would have been an extra $150 billion dollar hole in the balance sheet of the four largest banks. Major action would have been taken against the four largest banks if this was the case.

Please go over and read the whole thing. I stopped following the bank several quarters ago. Any additional facts on this possibility would be appreciated.

This would explain the banks' dragging their feet foreclosing properties.  Not only would they have to mark down their first mortgage but the 2nd lein would be marked to zero instead of the 15-20% loss as described in the 'Stress Tests' of early last year.

Living Rent Free

Trader Mark from fundmymutualfund.com had a great post about the apparent disconnect between income and spending -- it's not adding up.  I had my own suspicions about this but TraderMark does a much better job skewering several sacred cows so I'll defer to his rapier and wit:

I was looking through the avalanche of economic data today, and it struck me how once again Americans are spending well over their income growth.  

I've written about this in the past in conceptual terms but never put it into an analysis. The true stealth stimulus plan in America is letting so many of its people live "rent free" as they sit in defaulted homes not making a mortgage payment. This "cost savings" allows them to shop and spend, and otherwise support the American consumption society.

From anecdotal stories (many of them) it is now taking at minimum 9-12 months to get evicted, and that's in states without super high foreclosure rates. I read the other day some Florida locations are 2+ years now. So 9, 12, 15, 18 months of not having to make a $1200, $1500, $1800 payment. And it can go longer now if you enroll in the trial modifications offered by government, then redefault. If you are really good at playing the system you might be able to go through two whole default cycles with the trial modification in the middle. 3 years of rent free living? Nirvana.

Further, with the new accounting rules that were the nexus of the market rally in March 2009, the banks no longer had to mark value of assets on their balance sheet to market... so they can now mark to what they see fit. Hence this system works for them too. All these foreclosures they should be closing on are things they are in no hurry to do... because doing so would mean they need to stop pretending about the true valuation of these defaulting mortgages and start admitting reality. Don't you love what 1 change in accounting rules can do for a country? ;)

My suspicion is the banks decide how much of a loss they want to take on home loans each quarter and then foreclose enough homes to make that quarter.  (The easiest number for a bank to hit for the next several years!)  The Feds are turning a blind eye as they are terrified of another drop in home prices and want to keep the banks 'solvent'  All the mortgage modification programs give cover to the banks to delay foreclosures and regulate the supply of homes hitting the market. 

How does that saying go??? Owe the bank $10,000 and they own you, owe the bank $50 million and you own the bank.  In America we can do it better:  Own a trillion in mortgages and you own the US Government.

Harley Davidson (HOG) strangeness

I have a small short position in Harley Davidson (HOG) and their 3rd quarter earnings were released today. 

The headline numbers were predictable, 3rd quarter sales down 21.3% year over year, earnings down due to numerous write offs.  Stock opens lower.  So far so good for my short position.

As I look through the quarterly report and listened to their conference call two items caught my attention.
Source:  Harley Davidson press release 2009 October 15
              Harley Davidson shipments data

From their press release:

Guidance

The Company is narrowing its guidance for full-year 2009 shipments, and now expects to ship 222,000 to 227,000 Harley-Davidson motorcycles to dealers, including 35,000 to 40,000 during the fourth quarter. The Company continues to expect full-year gross margins to be between 30.5 percent and 31.5 percent.

So lets split the difference and say they are going to ship 37,500 motorcycles in the 4th quarter 2009.   In 4th quarter 2008 they shipped 80,476 units.  Harley Davidson is telling us right now shipments (and thus motorcycle revenue) will be more than 50%  lower for the fourth quarter.


I'm not disparaging the brand or the company.  They are in a tough business right now; selling a 20,000 dollar completely discretionary product.  Harley Davidson was very clear about their plans to reduce production in the 4th quarter and how their credit write offs continue to increase. I have to give the company credit for their presentations, but the data does not look good.

The stock closed 5+% higher for the day?