Muni bond redux

Late last year I mentioned the relative thrashing muni bonds had experienced.  Fast forward to today and the mass defaults as predicted by Meredith Whitney are not occurring and muni bonds have experienced a nice rebound.  Let's look at some charts:

The ETF's MUB and IEF are great for comparing the two sectors as they have almost the same duration of 7.43 vs. 7.24. While they are not precisely the same (MUB's bonds are more smeared out along the maturity curve while IEF's are very compact) it is good enough for this discussion.

As you can see MUB is now outperforming IEF on a relative basis and the yield one receives from MUB remains higher than IEF with an estimated yield to maturity of 3.30% versus 2.86% Usually municipals bonds yield less than treasuries due to their tax free income but not right now.  Assuming a return to 'normal' with muni bonds yielding 80% of treasuries you'd need MUB to increase by approximately 7.5%

[The math:  80% of IEF's ytm = 2.29%
MUB yield change (3.30 - 2.29) * duration of 7.43 = 7.50 ]

This does not include the tax free coupon one would receive while you wait for the trade to complete and also assumes treasury rates remain stable.  I'm of the opinion treasury rates will also drop in the near future so you'd gain there as well.  All in all a relatively low risk / low reward trade but considering the equity markets have been going nowhere for a couple months I'll take it.  MUB is also starting to outperform SPY on a relative basis as well, go figure...

Reminder: I don't manage your money and this is not a complete part of my investment portfolio. I may not tell you when I close out the position.  This should not be construed as investment advice as I do not know your tolerance for risk, tax situation, need for income, etc. 


Disclosure: Long MUB in both personal and client accounts.

Additional reading:
Ishares MUB etf detail
Ishares IEF etf detail
Business Insider
JPMorgan's comments


Note: Another possible reason why MUB is outperforming is the light issuance schedule for muni bonds right now. This may be due to the previous rush to market while Build America Bonds were still possible before the 12/31/10 deadline or the current high relative yield environment for muni bonds.
Bond Buyer article #1  & Article #2  (ht MuniLass)

Initial unemployment claims are going the wrong way

Initial unemployment claims are starting to creep back upwards on an absolute and year over year basis.  The standard seasonally adjusted 4 week moving average of initial claims (that's a mouthful!) has recently bounced back up to 440k from 400k.

While this does not look so bad if one looks at the data on an absolute level, one can see the trend clearly deteriorating on a year over basis [2nd chart]

Now this is only a few weeks but the trend is not going in the 'right' direction.  My previous post on initial claims data  provided two different theoretical outcomes merely by torturing the data via different means.

Some have posited the rise in initial clams is due to automotive factories laying off people because of supply chain problems stemming from the earthquake in Japan a few months back.  Another possibility is the increase in oil prices is finally starting to really bite into the consumers pocketbook and layoffs are ensuing in consumer sensitive sectors of the economy.  Regardless we will know soon if this is a short term blip in unemployment claims or a longer term trend.

The politics of oil

Yesterday President Obama announced new measures to increase drilling.  From Reuters

 U.S. President Barack Obama, under pressure from Republicans and the public to bring down gasoline prices, announced new measures on Saturday to expand domestic oil production in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.

Elections are hard to win with high gas prices:

High fuel prices have dented Obama's ratings in opinion polls and threaten to dampen the economic recovery that is critical to his re-election in 2012.

Considering the lead time required to get oil to market from a new find this will ironically help whomever is in office after the elections of 2012.

I seriously doubt the President would have increased leases available to oil companies if gasoline prices were $2.00 a gallon versus the current $4.00.

There's a reason alternative energies are called alternative and its because they are much more expensive per unit of energy than gasoline.  Until new forms of portable energy become cheaper than gasoline a President's politics will bend to the reality of high gas prices.

edit: if you are wondering why we are attacking Libya and not Syria, this is one reason.

Bank lending update

It's been a few months since I last highlighted total bank lending but not much has changed since late October. Just to make sure you don't think I forgot here's an update.

Total bank loans and leases as per the Fed continues its steady decline economic recovery notwithstanding.  As you can see there was a large recent spike but this was due to an accounting change in bank's loans and not a sudden increase in lending.  This lack of new lending may be one reason broad money supply is so sluggish of late.

Like last update the banks are buying US Treasuries instead of lending. If you wondering who is buying those hated T bonds look to your corner mega-huge bank.   Considering their funding costs and capital requirements are pretty much zero you could say banks would rather just play golf and clip Treasury coupons.

Money Money + Money -- Money supply update

The broadest money supply figures available (M2 + institutional money market funds) turned positive a few months ago but is only growing slowly.  Furthermore this money measure has not exceeded its pre crisis peaks.

Looking back in the mid 2000's you can see broad money supply was also very sluggish. With QE 2 ending in June we'll see if this data series can keep expanding.

Inflation expectations in the bond market

Here's an update on inflation expectations as expressed by the bond market.   While much is being said right now about inflation expectations becoming unglued the 10 year [Treasury - TIP] difference is not showing anything exceptional yet.   As you can see from the chart inflation expectations (as expressed by nominal yields - 'real' TIPS yields) are getting back to their 'normal' range of around 2.5 percent.

10 year TIP yields are near the low end of the range but some of that is due to nominal yields slowly dropping over time, pushing the TIPS yields down so the difference remains relatively constant.  With QE2 slated to end and oil prices (as well as other base commodities) rising it will be interesting to see if the implied breakeven inflation rate rises above long term resistance of ~2.6 percent.

Japan Nuclear Update: Fear and Loathing about Fukushima

It hasn't taken very long for the charlatans and plain fear mongers to try to capitalize on the situation in Japan. I recently saw a banner ad on my web site for a company shilling a supplement to prevent radiation injury to Americans. I am not going to link to the company and give them free publicity.

To be very clear:
YOU ARE IN NO DANGER IF YOU LIVE IN ALASKA, HAWAII OR THE CONTINENTAL US.
The EPA agrees with me without using all caps.
A professor from Berkeley agrees with me.

Those who have a memory longer than a year may recall two nuclear weapons detonated OVER Japan a few decades ago. The amount of nuclear radiation emitted from those events were several orders of magnitude higher than the current situation yet we didn't have anyone dying in America did we?

This chart from http://xkcd.com/radiation/ has been floating about showing the relative levels of radiation and I think one should really take a look at it to put some of the news reports in context.  One problem is our instruments are so sensitive that its very possible in America to detect the slightly elevated levels of radiation that have made it to our shores.  Then again, getting on an airplane would provide a much higher dose but that doesn't seem to be mentioned at the same time the TV breathlessly tells you the clouds of nuclear radiation are coming this way.

Plutonium:
There's been reports plutonium has been found on the grounds of the Fukushima power plants and we should all hit the panic button  Plutonium is a natural by product of the normal fission cycle which occurs in a power plant. What they didn't mention in the first reports is the scale of the plutonium concentration and that matters a lot. For some sanity I suggest you listen to this interview:
http://georneys.blogspot.com/2011/03/14th-interview-with-my-dad-nuclear.html

Tepco came out with some clarification of the Plutonium and it's not something to worry about
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11032812-e.html


Finding people in Japan:
The red cross has another site for finding people in Japan here:
http://www.familylinks.icrc.org/web/doc/siterfl0.nsf/htmlall/familylinks-japon-eng
I mentioned another site run by Google a couple days ago.

Predictions for cleanup taking 30 years:
I ran across a Bloomberg article predicting it will take 30 years and billions to clean this mess up. I link to it so we can see how accurate they are. I find it odd to make such predictions when the smoke hasn't even settled.

There's an interesting presentation by Arevea floating around which appears to give a good timeline of what has happened. Of course this is a theory regarding the damage of the cooling torus but it does look like a possible reason for the elevated radiation readings in the water.
https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dg4hcz37_289dr9g62f6

I'm not trying to sugar coat the issue in Japan which is still volatile and dangerous but please respond to any positive or negative news reports with a healthy dose of skepticism.