Torturing the initial claims data

Initial unemployment claims data came out today and weekly unemployment claims decreased to 415,000.  The number has bounced around quite a bit recently causing some gyrations in the market and I thought it would be instructive to dig down a little further into the data.

One item to note from this first graph is how volatile the raw data is.  Note how around year end the unemployment claims spike up dramatically. Compare the raw data to the 4 week moving average seasonally adjusted data and you can understand why the claims data has bounced around so much recently; we are in the post holiday layoff period.

Next let us examine the year over year change in initial claims. What is actually impressive to me is how close the raw data and 4 week seasonal data track each other.   (Note these two graphs do not show today's data)  I have drawn in some black lines showing the rise starting in 2008, a peak in early March 2009 and then a bottom and rebound in early 2010.  Note this is the change in claims and as you can see we are still dropping on a year over year basis but the rapid fall in initial claims has ended and we are trending back towards zero. You can also see the most recent raw claims data is bouncing around quite a bit, again due to seasonal affects and possibly the weather.

Is the glass half empty or half full?

We can torture the data a bit further and just for fun and see what models predict will happen next. Using March 27, 2010 as the baseline (the peak in the rate of decline in initial claims)  I let excel extrapolate the data out another 15 weeks.  Bottom line is you can come up with either a positive or negative prediction depending upon how may polynomials you use.

Using a 2 polynomial regression predicts (R2 of .9712) claims are near their deceleration point and will then continue to keep dropping over time.

You want a bearish case? No problem!  Using a 5 polynomial  (R2 of .9763) regression initial unemployment claims will eventually reverse their fall in 12 weeks or so and start to rise on a year over year basis

Please note I'm not making economic predictions here, I'm just looking at the shape of a graph.  Going forward we have several cross currents pulling claims in opposite directions.  ISM data has been quite positive which may bode well for fewer layoffs in the future.  On the negative side we have higher food and energy prices as well as continues austerity by the states and municipalities.  As always stay tuned and I'll keep you informed.

HT creditwritedowns
He has done some great work on this data series and his articles were the genesis of this post:
http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/01/is-the-government-data-fudging-jobless-claims.html
http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2010/09/jobless-claims-still-not-pointing-to-imminent-double-dip-recession.html

China's reserve ratio raising is finally starting to bite

China recently raised the bank reserve ratio requirement again and it looks like this time it's really starting to bite. 7 day repo rates (what banks charge each other for a 7 day loan) spiked up just before year end but they aren't falling back down as I had alluded to in my previous post. 

7 day Chinese repo rate
3 month Chinese repo rate

As you can see from the 7 day repo rate chart the spikes have been getting larger at the end of each quarter, hinting at banks scrambling to find enough cash for their books at quarter close.  While the rate has dropped  in the 7 day, the 3 month has u-turned and is going back up near its pre-12/31 closings.  The Chinese stock market has been going down recently and this removal of cash from the system may be the reason.  If one continues to observe high bank repo rates it does not bode well for the Chinese stock market or the whole commodity/reflation/Australia trade in general.

Reading list

Some stuff I've been reading / watching

David Einhorn video
http://wealthtrack-appletv.blip.tv/file/4406653/  
ht: http://www.eurosharelab.com/

http://pragcap.com/three-things-i-think-i-think-20

http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/01/european-debt-dynamics.html
European debt dynamics.  Borrowing at 5% and growing at 3% just digs a deeper hole.

http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/01/cautiously-optimistic-into-2011.html
Address says it all.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100009218/the-dam-breaks-in-portugal/
Has Portugal already asked for IMF help and no-one noticed?  Would be ironic if this episode of Euroland bailout occurs quietly.   Long term the trend is NOT Portugal's friend:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=GSPT10YR:IND
(Look at the 5 year history)

Portuguese recycling & Iceland recovery -- Why the Chinese and Japanese are buying EU debt

The recent news of both China and Japan buying EU debt provides a very interesting window into the various motivations of investors.  While most investors are leaving the PIIGS debt markets, China and Japan appear very willing to invest.  Why?  It appears the Asian nations' motivations are different than return of principal.  Both are exporting nations and if more European trading partners are forced into austerity measures of higher taxes and lower government spending their own export industries will suffer.

American policy makers should be mindful of this when negotiating with China. It may appear they have the upper hand when looking at their massive foreign exchange reserves, but China also needs our markets to keep their factories running.

Unfortunately Portugal looks to be the next domino to fall, Asian assistance notwithstanding.  FT's blog lays out the timeline I have previously alluded to: It appears once a PIIGS' bond yield pierces the 7% level a bailout eventually follows.

However even with these 'bailouts' and Euro Central Bank assistance the problem has not been solved. As austerity measures and budget cuts drag GDP down the burden of debt grows ever higher in a nasty feedback loop.
From Satyajit Das:

Cuts in government spending and higher taxes have mired the economy in recession. Falls in tax revenue necessitate increasingly deeper cuts in spending to try to stabilise public finances. In 2010, the budget deficit was forecast at 12% of GDP, even after spending cuts and tax rises worth Euro 14.5 billion   The problems of the banking sector are increasing due to the poor economic conditions. Hitherto largely confined to commercial property, problems are now spreading to the broader economy. Unemployment and lower incomes mean that householders are unable to meet payment obligations on mortgages and other loans. Weak economic conditions have affected businesses, increasing default levels. In the absence of strong economic growth, inflation and a massive devaluation, the peripheral economies, such as Ireland and Greece, may be unable to shrink themselves to solvency. A simple relationship demonstrates the unsustainable position:

Changes In Government Debt = Budget Deficit + [(Interest Rate – GDP Growth) X Debt]

In order to restore solvency, overburdened borrowers must stabilise debt and begin to reduce the level of borrowing. This requires GDP Growth exceeding interest rates, a budget surplus (through spending cuts and/or tax cuts) or a combination of these. EU/ IMF assistance to Ireland was designed to address the high yields on Irish bonds, which curtailed the State’s ability to borrow. But the 5.80% cost of the bailout debt requires an equivalent growth rate and a balanced budget simply to stabilise debt at current very high levels.

Meanwhile the recovery in Iceland provides contrast to the current austerity and higher tax drudgery in the weaker European countries:

The Nordic economy grew at 1.2pc in the third quarter and looks poised to rebound next year. It ends a gruelling slump caused largely by the "New Viking" antics of Landsbanki, Glitnir and Kaupthing, the trio of lenders that brought down Iceland's financial system in September 2008. . .

This has led to vastly different debt dynamics as they enter Year III of the drama. Iceland's budget deficit will be 6.3pc this year, and soon in surplus: Ireland's will be 12pc (32pc with bank bail-outs) and not much better next year . . . 

The pain has been distributed very differently. Irish unemployment has reached 14.1pc, and is still rising. Iceland's peaked at 9.7pc and has since fallen to 7.3pc.

Housing -- Been down so long, it looks like up to me

The home market appears to be taking another leg down after the tax rebate induced spike earlier this year.

More details on home prices can be found here:

http://paper-money.blogspot.com/2010/12/s-october-2010.html

http://paper-money.blogspot.com/2010/11/more-pain-less-gain-s-preview-for.html

Paper-economy tracks (2nd link) the Radar Logic index which appears to lead the more well known Case/Shiller index.

Unfortunately if home prices fall further this may set up a feedback loop as more households with negative equity decided to strategically default.  Furthermore the recent rise in long term interest rates will not help affordability either

Housing permits are falling again and coming very close to putting in an all time low for the time series (The all time low was hit just a few months ago)  Looking at the graph you will also notice how in previous recoveries housing permits quickly rebounded.  Not this time.  Considering home values are falling this puts pressure on new home construction.  Lumber prices are also going up.

Eventually home prices will fall enough for demand and supply to finally balance but it doesn't look like we are there yet. For now the downward trend appears it will continue.

Disclosure: Short housing related stocks

Ahead of schedule PIIGS bond yields make new highs

Ahead of schedule bond yields in the PIIGS of Europe have reached new highs.   'Risk Free' interest rates have risen as well since November so the relative spread may not be at a new maximum yet but the trend is going the wrong way.

Taking away the punchbowl one way or another, Chinese version

The Chinese sense of humor was evident as they raised short term interest rates on Christmas Day by 25 basis points. (Bloomberg) What is interesting about this Saturday surprise is what happened a few days before with their failed treasury bill auction.

The ministry sold 16.76 billion yuan ($2.53 billion) of 91- day securities, falling short of the planned 20 billion yuan target, according to traders at the lead underwriters of government debt, who asked not to be identified. The average winning yield was 3.6769 percent, according to the traders. That compared with 3.22 percent on the debt of similar maturity in the secondary market yesterday.

Since the Chinese central bank was not able to drain enough cash out of the markets via Tbill sales, they raised interest rates instead.   One possible reason why the Tbill auction was not well received is there appears to be other demands on short term money in the Chinese banking system.  Short term bank repo rates are spiking higher as the year comes to a close. Why buy 3 month Tbills at 3.7% when you can lend out at 5.60% in the 3 month repo market?

As you can see there were spikes in the repo rates just before the end of previous quarter ends and I wonder how much of this current rise is due to squaring the books before year end.  We'll know soon. . .